It's to the benefit of your motion that I won't be at Renovation, as I see a distinct conflict of interest in the officials who are marketing the Hugos also being eligible to win them at the same time they're doing the marketing.
I'm sorry you saw last year's action as a slap in Cheryl's face and indirectly in yours, and that it is a source of continued anger for you. To the best of my self-knowledge and awareness, I would feel the same regardless of who wanted to serve on the HAMC/officially market the award on the behalf of WSFS. I clearly see much more similarity between the Hugo subcommittee and the HAMC than you do, and I continue to believe the same rules should apply to both. Since the MPC oversees the HAMC, I admire that group's decision to have the same rules apply to it as well.
no subject
I'm sorry you saw last year's action as a slap in Cheryl's face and indirectly in yours, and that it is a source of continued anger for you. To the best of my self-knowledge and awareness, I would feel the same regardless of who wanted to serve on the HAMC/officially market the award on the behalf of WSFS. I clearly see much more similarity between the Hugo subcommittee and the HAMC than you do, and I continue to believe the same rules should apply to both. Since the MPC oversees the HAMC, I admire that group's decision to have the same rules apply to it as well.