ext_138824 ([identity profile] parrismcb.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] kevin_standlee 2013-09-18 08:00 pm (UTC)

thanks for this explanation of why the WSFS uses the rules as they/we do. I vaguely remember some of this history, but I don't regularly attend the business meetings unless I know there's specific issues I want to propose/defend. then I'll drag myself out and hunt for tea and sugar no matter how late the night before was for me. I generally trust the WSFS to be democratic and pragmatic.

Maybe we should set up a "Ask a SMOF anything" Q&A period online and at cons. Of course, we'd need 3 SMOFS and 4 moderators to present various philosophies and knowledge sets.....damn, another good idea shot down by the details of how to set up such a event, too bad we don't have people experienced in choosing interesting topics and appropriate panelists. Oh wait...

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting