I'd rather do this as a new standing rule for the introduction of motions at the BM: roughly Chairman states motion Proposer has a minute An opposer has a minute Vote to continue debate: requires 2/3 to kill motion Carry on.
This way it's up front in the Standing Rules, not "hidden in the back pages of Robert's", which is a defence against a lack of transparency.
no subject
I'd rather do this as a new standing rule for the introduction of motions at the BM: roughly
Chairman states motion
Proposer has a minute
An opposer has a minute
Vote to continue debate: requires 2/3 to kill motion
Carry on.
This way it's up front in the Standing Rules, not "hidden in the back pages of Robert's", which is a defence against a lack of transparency.