As Others See Us

[kevin_standlee]

It's a Festival, Jim, But Not as You Know It

A look at what Worldcons look like to someone who has attended one and enjoyed it, but continues to be mystified at why it doesn't act like "proper" book festivals.

It's yet another data point in how Worldcon in particular is organized in a way that looks odd to the point of insanity by anyone who hasn't grown up with it.

Comments

[totient]

... or we could, you know, have childcare that meets our program participants' needs. This isn't easy or cheap, but right now the demographics of Worldcon and similar conventions are such that childcare is a very big reason why people who're first getting interested in the community can't actually get involved. As this post demonstrates pretty clearly.

[jcfiala.livejournal.com]

Well, to be fair, the local conventions that my wife and I do enjoy provide some childcare, but they're not willing to take on a 2 year old. Once my little sprout hits about five or six, we'll be able to lend her off to the childrens programs and get a little more time for our own pursuits.

The main reason I'm not involved in Worldcon is because it's not a priority for me - I'm not willing to commit the resources and time to travel to them. (Some folks do - a couple in my scifi group started with Denvention and has hit just about every Worldcon since then, and of course so does Ken.) I'm happy enough with our local fannish experiences alongside my other hobbies... I don't expect Worldcon to change to suit me, but on the other hand, Worldcon doesn't expect me to change to suit it. :)

[scott-sanford.livejournal.com]

Some conventions do; my main local convention, OryCon, has had childcare for years, and children's programming as well. This may not work for every con, and Worldcon is weird in several ways. Frustratingly, one Worldcon might find providing childcare easy while the next finds it impossible - and the lack of predictability benefits nobody.