What a strange second provision. The first provision increases the number of choices given to the voters (in some circumstances), while the second provision potentially decreases the amount of statistical information given out after the voting - although not necessarily, because the saving clause "at least" remains in the instructions, but without the second minimum guideline. So it turns what was a rule into administrator discretion.

How did this pass last year without some explanation as to what the point was? It looks awfully as if the writers just looked for anything in the Hugo rules with the term "5%" and deleted it, regardless of what it said.