kevin_standlee: (Menlo)
kevin_standlee ([personal profile] kevin_standlee) wrote2006-07-26 08:38 pm

It Sort of Makes Sense

Part of the work I'm doing on The Big Project involves plotting the geographic centroid of each US state and picking out a city to stand for that state's centroid. This doesn't always work well for odd sized states. It appears, for instance, that the geographic centroid of Maryland is Washington DC.
ext_5149: (Thoughtful)

[identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com 2006-07-27 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
Why would you be finding the center of each state and not of a population based region? A number of states (Colorado) aren't really well grounded in the behavior of the population or geography. Colorado, Washington, and Kansas/Missouri, frex.

[identity profile] kevin-standlee.livejournal.com 2006-07-27 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
Because we're in a hurry and location centroids are easier. We know they're terrible. I don't have to pick the exact centroid, but it's at least a notional center of the state. We hate doing this in states like California, which are really at least two "states" for logistical purposes; however, the client insists on us quoting a single rate good for anywhere in California to (say) anywhere in Florida.
ext_5149: (Thoughtful)

[identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com 2006-07-27 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
Makes sense to me. Though a bit of a nightmare for you.