Well that would totally convince me to support Range Voting, if the voters were computer simulations rather than actual people. Figuring out how to express my opinions through voting is hard enough without adding additional unnecessary complexity. Especially since (correct me if I'm wrong here Kev) we use paper ballots. It will be impossible to tally by hand if we use Range Voting.
My second point is that if it actually works then we'll shortly have evidence of it working for other groups. Then we can decide based upon real world evidence rather than theoretical simulations.
Re: Supermajority vote?
My second point is that if it actually works then we'll shortly have evidence of it working for other groups. Then we can decide based upon real world evidence rather than theoretical simulations.