kevin_standlee (
kevin_standlee) wrote2007-03-12 06:54 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Another Reason for Real Names on Badges?
At the risk of starting *ahem* a flame war, I would like to point to an article about what is formally being called "online disinhibition effect," which is how people are apt to say things with less restraint online than they would in person. (And my thanks to Cheryl for pointing me at it.) In short, people flame more often online than they do in person.
Now I personally think this is more common when the person doing the flaming is behind a pseudonym. (By which I mean that nobody reading what you write knows who you are in real life; this is not the same thing as someone who has an odd handle but puts his/her name in his profile -- the rough equivalent if printing someone's real name under their fan name on a membership badge.) I sign my own name to these posts, so just possibly I'm showing a bit more restraint.
I was particularly interested in this extract:
Now I personally think this is more common when the person doing the flaming is behind a pseudonym. (By which I mean that nobody reading what you write knows who you are in real life; this is not the same thing as someone who has an odd handle but puts his/her name in his profile -- the rough equivalent if printing someone's real name under their fan name on a membership badge.) I sign my own name to these posts, so just possibly I'm showing a bit more restraint.
I was particularly interested in this extract:
...In face-to-face interaction, the brain reads a continual cascade of emotional signs and social cues, instantaneously using them to guide our next move so that the encounter goes well. Much of this social guidance occurs in circuitry centered on the orbitofrontal cortex, a center for empathy. This cortex uses that social scan to help make sure that what we do next will keep the interaction on track.It occurs to me that there are a series of typically fannish behaviors that fall into this same description, characterized by an utter lack of ability to read emotional cues and emotional signs. Does this really mean that science fiction fans need to have their heads examined?
Research by Jennifer Beer, a psychologist at the University of California, Davis, finds that this face-to-face guidance system inhibits impulses for actions that would upset the other person or otherwise throw the interaction off. Neurological patients with a damaged orbitofrontal cortex lose the ability to modulate the amygdala, a source of unruly impulses; like small children, they commit mortifying social gaffes like kissing a complete stranger, blithely unaware that they are doing anything untoward.
no subject
And yes, this means it is a subjective judgement call by someone in Registration, and you can't handle it by a computer program in a cut-and-dried manner. Sometimes it's justified; sometime's it's not. I gave examples in my article of both sorts of cases.
I'm pretty sure the idea that such a decision has to be made using subjective human judgement is absolutely horrifying to many people, particularly since fans don't have much common sense; indeed, it seems to be a marker for fannishness that we expect life to be a series of absolute yes/no decisions like a computer program.
Hmmm
FWIW, I always use my real name. But I'm sympathetic to folks who have their own reasons to not want to do the same.
-Espana Sheriff
Re: Hmmm
I don't exaggerate that much, really, given that I've encountered people with that attitude, most notoriously at one of ConJose's feedback sessions.
Nobody forces you to attend a convention. If the convention's policies aren't to your liking, then you probably shouldn't join it. Conversely, if I'm organizing a convention, I think I can refuse to admit someone who refuses to abide by what I consider reasonable rules of conduct. (Yes, there are certain classes of such discrimination that are wrong and/or illegal, and I'm not talking about any of them here.)
Mind you, I'm probably a hopeless old fossil here, since the conventions drawing the most number of people are things like anime cons, which, even when fan-run, seem to take the "show" and "ticket" approach, and most of their attendees do seem to be me to be ticket-buyers who expect entertainment for their admission ticket than convention members joining a community. (The latter was why I started attending SF conventions.)
And so am I, as I said in that article. What I'm saying is that you can't really make a bright-line distinction here. I've worked on too many conventions to think that one-size-fits-all, no exceptions, is likely to work in this area. But fans detest shades of gray, I'm afraid.
Re: Hmmm
no subject
no subject
This inability of people to see this distinction thoroughly muddies the waters of these discussions.
no subject
But say I was a turd and didn't want to put down my name on a form that didn't include a pseudonym space. Easy enough, pick something just similar enough to my own name that at quick glance would look like it. Pay by check. And that's if I get one early. No one asks for ID when a person pays by cash at the door. I've done that a few times.
no subject
no subject
You'll get no complaint from me about this. Besides, you're not being anti-social by hiding behind a non-use name.
It may sound otherwise, but I've objected to conventions demanding government-issued photo ID even when the person at the registration desk knows me personally. This is done "to be fair and impartial," but it's stupid and loses track of what the purpose of the ID check is for. For a pre-registered member, it's to confirm that you are who you say you are and can pick up the member's materials. If the registration desk person (or someone of authority at Registration) knows who I am, there's no need to request photo ID. (Note that if the reg staff don't know me, I don't balk at showing something to establish my credentials.)
no subject
no subject
no subject