kevin_standlee: (Hugo Sign)
kevin_standlee ([personal profile] kevin_standlee) wrote2007-07-16 08:53 am
Entry tags:

Misinterpretation

One of the comments on the Fan Writer Hugo Controversy croggled me sufficiently that I want to quote it here. I'm not meaning to pick on the writer, who comments here and is a BASFA member, but this one sort of surprised me:
...my reading of the WSFS constitution's section on the Hugo awards, taken in its entirety, leads me to believe the purpose of the Fan Writer award is to recognize non-professional sci-fi writers.
Wow. What I'm wondering if this is a widespread opinion -- that "Fan Writer" is taken by a significant number of people as "non-professional, fan-written science fiction." Of course, it's not -- "Fan" doesn't mean "Amateur" in our field; it means "enthusiast," which is not the same thing, and that's why one can be a fan and a pro simultaneously. Nor is "Fan Writer" intended as a category aimed at recognizing "fan fiction." Fan writing is writing about science fiction, fantasy, and fandom. All of the people nominated in that category (and everyone who has been nominated in that category in my memory) have been nominated for their writing about the field, not because of any fiction they've written.

[identity profile] kevin-standlee.livejournal.com 2007-07-16 05:35 pm (UTC)(link)
You could specify that it's not for fiction.
That might work, but still obliges subjective (although not quite so heavily subjective) judgment by administrators.
Although even that would be objected to because it cuts out some things.
Specifically, "faan fiction" -- fiction about fandom. (And for anyone else watching, this is not at all like "fan fiction.")

My one paid piece of written fiction (semi-professional because it paid only 1.25 cents/word) was in fact faan fiction -- "The Bridge at Waikiki," part of Again, Alternate Worldcons.

[identity profile] debgeisler.livejournal.com 2007-07-16 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)
You could specify that it's not for fiction.

That might work, but still obliges subjective (although not quite so heavily subjective) judgment by administrators.


The problem is that the 'net has widened exposure to and speed of fanfic...and many people think of "fan writer" in that way, not tied to "fanzine" in the sense that the regular denizens of the Worldcon understand.

I'm beginning to think more clarification is definitely needed...or else (my own preference) we could just kill all of the "best people" awards. I know the latter won't happen...