ext_4788 ([identity profile] sethb.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] kevin_standlee 2007-09-01 11:25 pm (UTC)

I think the large No Preference vote may have actually been Other; with STV (the way votes are counted), there's no harm in putting your joke first followed by your preference among the real bids. (There could be if so many people did that that a real bid was eliminated, but that's unlikely and has never come close to happening in Site Selection.)

How many of the 53 had Montreal or KC listed, just not first? Those aren't No Preference.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting