kevin_standlee (
kevin_standlee) wrote2010-06-19 09:15 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Nice Words about SF Conventions
Thanks to
smofbabe for pointing out a nice column by Ben Bova about science fiction conventions.
I suppose it would be churlish of me to point out the factual error in his article regarding the frequency of non-US Worldcons. Alas, he's not the only person to make mistakes of this sort. For example, I met a fan a few years ago who confidently announced that Australia's 2010 Worldcon bid "wasn't allowed" because "the rules require the Worldcon to be in the USA in all even numbered years." She had never actually read the rules, but generalized from the only experience she had, which had the 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008 Worldcons in the USA and the 2003, 2005, 2007, and 2009 Worldcons in other countries. Having only encountered Worldcons from 2002 and never having looked at any history, she generalized from insufficient data and drew a bad conclusion.
Based on this same sort of generalizing-from-insufficient data, I suspect we'll see people making Bova's same mistake, as they'll only take 2010-2014 as their base set and assume that "the rules require" that every fourth Worldcon be off-continent, with the other three required to be held in either the USA or Canada.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I suppose it would be churlish of me to point out the factual error in his article regarding the frequency of non-US Worldcons. Alas, he's not the only person to make mistakes of this sort. For example, I met a fan a few years ago who confidently announced that Australia's 2010 Worldcon bid "wasn't allowed" because "the rules require the Worldcon to be in the USA in all even numbered years." She had never actually read the rules, but generalized from the only experience she had, which had the 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008 Worldcons in the USA and the 2003, 2005, 2007, and 2009 Worldcons in other countries. Having only encountered Worldcons from 2002 and never having looked at any history, she generalized from insufficient data and drew a bad conclusion.
Based on this same sort of generalizing-from-insufficient data, I suspect we'll see people making Bova's same mistake, as they'll only take 2010-2014 as their base set and assume that "the rules require" that every fourth Worldcon be off-continent, with the other three required to be held in either the USA or Canada.
no subject
I'm just waiting for a staff member to approve my comments since I'm a new commenter.
(no subject)
no subject
The only difference is, instead of having to uncover the rules of nature by trial and error, in this case one can look them up.
no subject
I love his story of St Louis. From my own experience you really may not know who you're talking to at a con, even if they have a name badge!
(no subject)
(no subject)
BB's Con Report
"The World Science Fiction Convention is usually held in the United States, the voters select an overseas location about once every four years or so."
Because that shows that the location is not in a strict rotation.
I'd also like to say that I *don't* like the St. Louis story. It is rejoicing in vengeance, which strikes me as petty and mean. Comeuppance tales are particularly attractive to fen, because most of us did not grow up in the in-groups. Turning the tables on our aggressors means we have failed to learn anything from them.
Re: BB's Con Report
Re: BB's Con Report
Re: BB's Con Report