ext_123607 ([identity profile] amysisson.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] kevin_standlee 2010-09-21 10:31 pm (UTC)

I agree that the two are not mutually exclusive. I consider myself both a fan and a pro.

I also agree it's too much of a slippery slope to have administrators start determining limiters on something like this, when there is obviously a lot of disagreement.

However, I personally feel that it's likely that two writers who make their entire living from writing are probably claiming as a tax deduction the cost of the internet access that allows them to blog, which is why they've been nominated for this award. I know that a lot of blog sites/software are free, but it seems likely that their actual internet connectivity is a tax write-off because they're professional writers and they likely claim they use the internet connection for their income-generating purposes.)

I absolutely could be wrong about this; for all I know they they could pro-rate their personal and business internet use and pro-rate the write-off. Maybe they don't write-off their internet access at all.

But I have to say, I'm disappointed in the voters that they have awarded the fan writing Hugo to people who have been full-time professional writers for years, and I'm honestly a bit disappointed in those two writers for accepting the nomination and the award. I believe they are winning based on the familiarity of the names they've made writing professionally.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting