kevin_standlee (
kevin_standlee) wrote2006-12-03 05:23 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
SMOFCon Poker Challenge
Thanks to the Inquisition ending on schedule, we were able to get the poker tournament started shortly after 10:30 PM. We had initially 21 people signed up. Two scratched, but two people joined "at the door," so we started with three tables of seven players. Dave McCarty brought a very nice set of heavy-duty poker chips, which helped a lot. (Quality "clay" chips are much nicer to use than the cheap lightweight plastic chips.) I had previously sorted out the initial buy-ins, and that expedited the set-up process. People gave me $10 and I gave them a small stack representing 1000 chips.
I shortened the rounds to 15 minutes and escalated the blinds somewhat faster than originally planned. The first two rounds were a bit tentative, with passive play and people doing a lot of calling without much raising. But in the third round the pace picked up, and then carnage erupted, and a bunch of players went out at the same time. We consolidated to two tables after a break. In round 4, once again a bunch went out almost simultaneously, and with that we had a final table -- with only seven players, because of so many eliminations happening within a five-minute period.
Shortly into round 4, the three short stacks fell away, and we were down to the four players "in the money." The pace slowed slightly, but it wasn't too much longer before we were heads up between Alexis Layton and Gary Blog. We had "chipped up" a bit as the blinds increased, and we were at the 500/1000 level. Thus the big blind represented the entire buy-in of each original player.
The big winner, taking home $126, was Alexis Layton.
I was a little concerned that most people would be annoyed that they'd paid $10 and got less than an hour of play; however, I did not hear any complaints, and in the end the tournament actually took between 2-3 hours, which was what I originally budgeted. Possibly I should have had slower initial blind escalation, but then had it ramp up much faster later. That would produce about the same length while most players are apt to get at least an hour of play.
I finished in eleventh place. I had an early moment of nerves, as I went all-in early and survived. As I said at the time, "It would have been embarrassing if the Tournament Director was the first person eliminated." My big mistake of the night was to not push harder when dealt K-K. I should have bet big early and chased everyone out. As it was, I ended up losing to a pair of aces, which crippled me and forced me out shortly afterwards.
Of course, as Tournament Director, I had to stay all the way to the end, but that's okay. I enjoyed it, and the smoffing that went on after we paid everyone off and cleaned everything up.
I was amused to see that today's Foxtrot cartoon was highly relevant, both with Alex winning the Hold-Em tournament and Boston being awarded the right to host the 2007 SMOFCon. That assumes that Boston wants me to organize another poker tournament, of course.
I shortened the rounds to 15 minutes and escalated the blinds somewhat faster than originally planned. The first two rounds were a bit tentative, with passive play and people doing a lot of calling without much raising. But in the third round the pace picked up, and then carnage erupted, and a bunch of players went out at the same time. We consolidated to two tables after a break. In round 4, once again a bunch went out almost simultaneously, and with that we had a final table -- with only seven players, because of so many eliminations happening within a five-minute period.
Shortly into round 4, the three short stacks fell away, and we were down to the four players "in the money." The pace slowed slightly, but it wasn't too much longer before we were heads up between Alexis Layton and Gary Blog. We had "chipped up" a bit as the blinds increased, and we were at the 500/1000 level. Thus the big blind represented the entire buy-in of each original player.
The big winner, taking home $126, was Alexis Layton.
I was a little concerned that most people would be annoyed that they'd paid $10 and got less than an hour of play; however, I did not hear any complaints, and in the end the tournament actually took between 2-3 hours, which was what I originally budgeted. Possibly I should have had slower initial blind escalation, but then had it ramp up much faster later. That would produce about the same length while most players are apt to get at least an hour of play.
I finished in eleventh place. I had an early moment of nerves, as I went all-in early and survived. As I said at the time, "It would have been embarrassing if the Tournament Director was the first person eliminated." My big mistake of the night was to not push harder when dealt K-K. I should have bet big early and chased everyone out. As it was, I ended up losing to a pair of aces, which crippled me and forced me out shortly afterwards.
Of course, as Tournament Director, I had to stay all the way to the end, but that's okay. I enjoyed it, and the smoffing that went on after we paid everyone off and cleaned everything up.
I was amused to see that today's Foxtrot cartoon was highly relevant, both with Alex winning the Hold-Em tournament and Boston being awarded the right to host the 2007 SMOFCon. That assumes that Boston wants me to organize another poker tournament, of course.
no subject
ON the other hand, 2-7 I'll play like Bullets Under. That's a great way to make everyone think your nuts and get you at least twice as many calls when they're being fished in.
Chris
no subject
no subject
In many ways, Smofcon has at least three functions/personalities:
It is in many ways a working convention -- I'm willing to bet that at least some of the conversation around the poker tables was still focused on cons and conrunning.