kevin_standlee (
kevin_standlee) wrote2009-10-02 10:28 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Road to Rio
So Rio de Janeiro will host the 2016 Olympics and Chicago will have to settle for (possibly) the 2012 Worldcon.
I'm intrigued that some of the reports I read suggested Rio was the favorite of many IOC members who thought it important that the Olympics move around and go to countries it had not been before. To that extent, it's the same attitude I've seen in many Worldcon races.
I'm intrigued that some of the reports I read suggested Rio was the favorite of many IOC members who thought it important that the Olympics move around and go to countries it had not been before. To that extent, it's the same attitude I've seen in many Worldcon races.
no subject
no subject
Some have lamented that changes we've made to the site selection system seem to be reducing the number of contested bids. I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing. Bidding may be part of fannish culture, but it's also very expensive -- and that cost, in both money and people points, comes out of the Worldcons in some way. For example, I'm so worn out and broke from Worldcon bidding that there's no way I could get seriously involved in another Bay Area bid, even though there are things I'd like to propose for one.
no subject
no subject