that doesn't mean that I think it's worth replacing Hugo and site-selection voting scheme in the first place.
Then you might as well just use a random name drawing out of a hat, since that's about the same difference in quality you're getting by using IRV instead of Range Voting.
Social Utility Efficiencies Range (honest voters) 96.71% 94.66% Range & Approval (strategic voters) 78.99% 77.01% IRV (honest voters) 78.49% 76.32% IRV (strategic exaggerating voters) 39.07% 39.21%
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re: Missing the point
Date: 2007-02-10 11:20 pm (UTC)http://rangevoting.org/Why99.html
that doesn't mean that I think it's worth replacing Hugo and site-selection voting scheme in the first place.
Then you might as well just use a random name drawing out of a hat, since that's about the same difference in quality you're getting by using IRV instead of Range Voting.
Social Utility Efficiencies
Range (honest voters) 96.71% 94.66%
Range & Approval (strategic voters) 78.99% 77.01%
IRV (honest voters) 78.49% 76.32%
IRV (strategic exaggerating voters) 39.07% 39.21%