Date: 2010-02-02 07:37 pm (UTC)
I think we're charging too much for those supporting memberships -- approximately twice what I think we should be.

It happens that I agree with this wholeheartedly. During site selection in 2001, we refused to allow the site selection voting fee/supporting rate to rise, as our competitors had insisted it should. Had it been possible, we would have insisted that it *decline.* And at no point after we won did we ever increase the supporting membership rate.

I have watched the rapid ascent of the rate with no little annoyance, and I would *happily* decouple the rate from the initial attending rate.

However, I do not believe that the rate should be viewed as the rate to vote in the Hugo Awards. Voting for the Hugos is one of the rights of a member of the Worldcon. If people aren't interested in Worldcon, I'm not interested in improving their ability to vote.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 34 5
678 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
2021 22 23 24 25 26
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 07:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios