I suspect more things would fail of ratification, just because the group ratifying is different from the group originally passing. And it would cause people concerned with WSFS governance to spend energy finding ways to annoy Worldcon members with WSFS issues :-). All in all that might well be a good thing, either directly or because it pulls the legs out from under the elitist argument.
But it doesn't; the elitist argument is pretty much perfect and self-contained and can't be defeated from the outside, to those really committed to the position.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 04:21 pm (UTC)But it doesn't; the elitist argument is pretty much perfect and self-contained and can't be defeated from the outside, to those really committed to the position.