How Not to Handle a Guest
Oct. 19th, 2007 12:16 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Other people have already commented on this, and I'm a bit late to the party, but in case you haven't seen it before: United Fan Con 'Uninvites' Peter David.
It appears that he had been invited to be a convention guest (travel expenses paid, no appearance fee), and that the convention had used him in their advertising, but then decided that they couldn't afford his expenses and that paying for the Big Name Media Guests was much more important, so they uninvited him.
The comments are somewhat interesting, including the guy (who acts a bit like a sock-puppet for UFC, but it's hard to say) who claimed that David shouldn't have said anything at all about this, to which I say "rubbish" and think stronger terms.
And there is further nonsense from someone who has no real idea of what she's talking about regarding convention economics -- despite apparently losing her shirt running one -- and seems to think that conrunners are Out To Get Her just because she's a poor little media fan.
Incidentally, because it came up in one of the side conversations regarding this, I would like to remind people that I wrote a while back about where the Worldcon's money goes. ConJose, and most other Worldcons, are pretty open with their finances. I'll send anyone who wants it a copy of ConJose's final budget spreadsheet -- just write to me directly.
Meanwhile, I'd like to remind people that "professional/amateur" and "professionally/amateurishly" are different things -- in fact, they probably form a 2x2 grid. Either kind of event is capable of treating people in either way.
Update, October 23, 1300: UFC reinvited David. I'm not sure if I'm more surprised that they did so under apparently pressure (and money freeing up somewhere else) or that David was willing to come anyway. As he said (more or less), he's coming because of the people who said they were going to UFC to see him, not for UFC's organizers' sake.
It appears that he had been invited to be a convention guest (travel expenses paid, no appearance fee), and that the convention had used him in their advertising, but then decided that they couldn't afford his expenses and that paying for the Big Name Media Guests was much more important, so they uninvited him.
The comments are somewhat interesting, including the guy (who acts a bit like a sock-puppet for UFC, but it's hard to say) who claimed that David shouldn't have said anything at all about this, to which I say "rubbish" and think stronger terms.
And there is further nonsense from someone who has no real idea of what she's talking about regarding convention economics -- despite apparently losing her shirt running one -- and seems to think that conrunners are Out To Get Her just because she's a poor little media fan.
Incidentally, because it came up in one of the side conversations regarding this, I would like to remind people that I wrote a while back about where the Worldcon's money goes. ConJose, and most other Worldcons, are pretty open with their finances. I'll send anyone who wants it a copy of ConJose's final budget spreadsheet -- just write to me directly.
Meanwhile, I'd like to remind people that "professional/amateur" and "professionally/amateurishly" are different things -- in fact, they probably form a 2x2 grid. Either kind of event is capable of treating people in either way.
Update, October 23, 1300: UFC reinvited David. I'm not sure if I'm more surprised that they did so under apparently pressure (and money freeing up somewhere else) or that David was willing to come anyway. As he said (more or less), he's coming because of the people who said they were going to UFC to see him, not for UFC's organizers' sake.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 07:59 pm (UTC)Yes, that, exactly. And it goes both ways, too - if the organizers of an event are behaving in a professional manner, they deserve the same treatment in return.
I'm one of the people who get the dmv@burningman bounce. We had a letter come through, some three weeks after the application deadline (Mutant Vehicles go through a pre-screening process before the event), that basically amounted to "O HAI I MAED U A ART CAR." My response, in part, read "Simply because we are a volunteer organization does not mean we don't handle things professionally. If you were attempting to contact the real Department of Motor Vehicles, would you have used l33t-speak?"
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:05 pm (UTC)I'm also extremely disturbed by the some apparent sockpuppets of UFC who are apparently popping up on other boards with potentially libelous comments about Mr. David's behavior at other conventions. The other interesting thing is some UFC attendees' comments on Mr. David's post talking about the falling off of attendance, and the direct correlation between that and the con runners' money grubbing. There isn't anything wrong with media cons, but there is a lot wrong UFC's attitude, and I'm not impressed by the behavior of the defender's, not to mention the lack of basic English skills.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:14 pm (UTC)Nor do I have any particular reason to bash UFC or any media con in particular. Bad behavior is bad behavior, whether it's done by "media" cons or "literary" cons or "fan run" conventions or "professional shows."
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:12 pm (UTC)They definitely picked the wrong guest treat pull this on, too.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:12 pm (UTC)Yeah, I may complain about the cost of WorldCon, but not about the value.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:19 pm (UTC)Yes, you're right about the value-for-money of a Worldcon. But I can actually see the point of some people who think it's too expensive. Those people are actually interested in only one aspect of the event, or possibly a small number of pieces. From their point of view, they shouldn't have to pay for anything other than the bit they want. I expect such people are dissatisfied at paying a single price to go into Disneyland if they only want to ride one ride, either.
And let us not just "bash media fans" here -- this same complaint about having to pay for more than you want could be made by, say, fanzine fans who would prefer to hand out in the fan lounge all weekend, or costumers who think the only purpose of the convention is to have the Worldcon Masquerade, or dealers who don't think people should have to pay anything to enter the Dealers Room, or... well, I could go on.
Everyone has their own special interest. Me, I recognize that my membership is paying for the entire experience, and that it's very difficult to pull individual pieces out of it without destroying the overall event.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:29 pm (UTC)See, you charge the set price for the con and then add special, let's call them tickets, that permit entry to the specialized areas: gaming, filking, fanzine lounge, dealer's room, programming, film room, anime room, art show. That's it...free market cons. If a room can't sustain itself with the tickets it sells, they are effectively "voted off" the con the next year.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 09:16 pm (UTC)No, those would be the people who should be going to Costume-Con.
Real costumers know that the purpose of a WorldCon is to attend all the great parties after one has survived the Masquerade.
:-)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 10:36 pm (UTC)I think it's more F&SF - a little of everything.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:17 pm (UTC)What dorks they were to do that to him.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:35 pm (UTC)The fact that they choose to cut a guest prior to a Convention shows either a fairly ugly cash flow problem, or a level of incompetence that is rather impressive, in the "oh-look-its-an-iceberg-in-our-way-should-we-do-something"
kind of way.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 12:42 am (UTC)Here's part of what I've writen about it:
1. 1994 Conclave, or Convex, or something like that
Anyway, he was invited to be the GoH at a brand new regional con that was being held in Navarre Beach, Florida. I have forgotten the name of the con, but it was Consomething -- Concave, Convex, like that. The con was aimed at a young audience who played the then nascent LARPs, stuff like that, so it was almost entirely an under-30's crowd.
We were on the beach in Florida, in a room being paid for by the con. [...] Though my husband had originally been invited to the con as a comped GoH -- and we had made clear we were on a very tight budget -- sometime late Saturday the staff handler asked if he would pay for the rest of our meals himself and just let them know how much they were, because they were having a "little cash flow problem". We didn't realize how big this problem was until we went to check out and discovered that the con couldn't actually cover the cost of the room, either. (As a note to your readers who may protest that plenty of cons expect guests to pay for their rooms, memberships, etc, I'd like to point out that I have no problem with that if that's made clear up front, but to offer to cover a GoH and then tell them at the end of the con, "Oops, um, sorry, the con chair has maxed out his credit card and can't pay for your room" is the very heart of pesky misrepresentation.)
In the end, we ended up having to pay for the con with part of the rent money, and learned a lesson about new little regional cons and funding. Oh, by the way, I don't think they ever held another one. Problems finding a hotel, or something like that.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 01:33 am (UTC)Oh, my. *sigh* I'm still pretty shocked that any convention would invite a guest and then not cover their expenses (or tell them at the last minute "oops, sorry, changed our minds" for that matter). I was raised to think of guests as, well, the ones who got the best food first, the most comfortable bed, and the hot water before the tank ran out.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-23 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 10:12 pm (UTC)I am, after all, a Notorious Media Fan myself, given that I got my start in comics and made amateur Doctor Who films in college and similarly behaved in Dangerously Non-Literary Ways.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 12:13 am (UTC)Actually, now I want a shirt that says Dangerously Non-Literary on it.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 12:26 am (UTC)THANKS A LOT KEVIN NOW I'M HAVING FLASHBACKS ARGH DIE DIE DIE
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 12:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 12:43 am (UTC)But get me drunk first.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 02:47 am (UTC)All over again.
Oh well. Seem sto be being kept to one a decade, which isn't that bad.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 12:48 pm (UTC)