Bay Area Rail Map
Oct. 21st, 2007 01:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
From a mailing list of SF fans who are also transit buffs comes a good map of Bay Area Rail Transit in the style of the London Underground Map.
I like the map. Like the LU map, it sacrifices absolute geography for clarity, which means the scale is distorted in places, but it means you can see how to get from A to B by transit, if possible.
I like the map. Like the LU map, it sacrifices absolute geography for clarity, which means the scale is distorted in places, but it means you can see how to get from A to B by transit, if possible.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-21 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-21 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:11 am (UTC)As you can see, it's actually possible to circle San Francisco Bay proper by rail only, but it takes a lot of transfers and can only be done a few times a day, with the weak link being the section between Hayward and San Jose. I could, for instance, take the Amtrak Capitol north to Oakland Coliseum, BART to Millbrae Caltrain (or BART to Embarcadero then Muni Metro to 4th & King Caltrain), Caltrain to San Jose Diridon (or to Mountain View, then VTA light rail to Santa Clara Great America ACE/Amtrak), then ACE (or Amtrak Capitol) to Fremont.
I live within an easy walk of the Fremont Centerville station -- one wall of my apartment complex's parking lot adjoins the station's parking lot -- and, as you probably know, walk down to the station many evenings for the exercise.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:04 am (UTC)For comparison, see the official BART System Map. And -- I take it you didn't realize it -- it includes a whole bunch more transit that isn't BART, including the Amtrak Capitols, ACE, Caltrain, Muni Metro, and VTA light rail. BART's own maps, if they ever show those forms of transport, tend to behave as if they're irrelevant.
And anyway the diagram style is very different -- LU-style maps have rules about never showing more than 45-degree bends, for instance. See the Wikipedia Article about the Tube Map for further discussion of this style.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:14 am (UTC)The official BART map is done in a similar style, but there are a couple of greater-than 45 degree bends, and when I looked at it, I see that one line does go beyond Daly City now (which none did last I was out there), and didn't Concord used to be the end of the yellow line?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:25 am (UTC)BART's map attempts to stay geographically accurate, which is why there are so many wiggles in it. Tube-style maps sacrifice geographic accuracy for diagrammatic ease of use. Contrast the standard Tube map with a geographically accurate Tube map to see the difference.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:49 am (UTC)Things are better than they were ten years ago, but only a little bit. For instance, you still can't get from the Capitol Corridor/ACE line to San Jose Airport unless you do a very cumbersome double transfer. You used to be able to do it from ACE, but they no longer stop at Santa Clara/El Camino Real station, and won't for years until the station is rebuilt. (The underlying reason appears to do with the track layout and who owns which track -- Amtrak/ACE trains interfere with Caltrain trains if they cross over to a track with a passenger platform.) It was bad enough when you had to use a bus transfer the way you do to/from Oakland, but a double-transfer is too much for me, and I'm a transit enthusiast.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 06:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-22 05:44 pm (UTC)