kevin_standlee: Logo created for 2005 Worldcon and sometimes used for World Science Fiction Society business (WSFS Logo)
[This is not an official statement from the World Science Fiction Society. I am not President of WSFS, Inc. This is my personal opinion, not that of any organization, club, convention, committee, corporation, or other entity that I ever have been or currently am a member, officer, or employee. The WSFS logo is up there because I'm writing about WSFS.]

Somewhere along the way, it appears that people have got it into their heads that being listed on the Worldcon Bids page on the WSFS.org website implies either:

1. These bids have been officially approved and blessed in some way by an Official Central Board of Directors. This isn't true. As far as I know, none of them have even filed their bidding papers yet, although if I do get word of a 2026 bid actually filing (and time is almost up), I'll put links to the filings on the WSFS site.

2. Being listed on that page means that they've already been selected, and it's hopeless to say or do anything, because the decisions have already made. This of course is also not true. The lack of multiple bidders for most future years is a function of various things, but it has nothing to do with an equivalent to the International Olympic Committee having selected them and locked out anyone else.

I wish that people who think this, when given the actual way things work, would give some sort of explanation of why they think this way. Unless they would do so, all I can assume is that they think something like, "But that's how everything works. Nobody is allowed to do anything unless they are given official approval to do it by Central Strong Authority."

As of tonight, there is an additional statement on the bidding page that tries to make it more obvious.

None of the sites listed here have been selected to hold a Worldcon. Bids do not need any sort of "pre-approval" to announce a bid. Bids only become seated Worldcons upon selection by the members of the Worldcon two years before the year indicated.


I hope people read it.

[Again, this is my personal opinion, not an official statement from any organization, convention, corporation, or any other entity. Believe it or not, I really can have personal opinions that differ from any organization, etc. of which I'm a member. I am not the King of Worldcon, owner of Worldcon Intellectual Property, and Duke of the World Science Fiction Society. And I am very definitely not the Boss of the Hugos.]
kevin_standlee: (SMOF Zone)
If you're interested in watching the presentations and Q&A sessions from Worldcons and bids from SMOFCon 40 in Providence, they are now posted to the Worldcon Events YouTube channel.

Because SMOFCon 40 was a fully hybrid convention and was recording their program items, there was no need for me to bring the video gear with me, particularly as they very kindly promised me that I could have the Worldcon Q&A session videos and post them to the YouTube Worldcon Events channel. That way, the videos did not depend upon an individual SMOFCon keeping them online. This is more important than you might think. Most individual conventions eventually dissolve; their web sites evaporate, the links rot, or they might even delete their YouTube channel, as one Worldcon did not that long ago. The Worldcon Events channel is managed by the Hugo Awards Marketing Committee, and therefore should be considered to have a longer lifespan than just a single convention.

I received the full video of the entire Q&A, including all of the setup and the changeover time between presenters, and the inevitable issues with tech of various sorts, a few days ago. This was pretty much what you would have seen if you had been there in person or attending online. (As it happens, because I did not need to record anything, I was over in a different room setting up the Probability & Statistics Seminar.)

Today, I loaded the video into Premiere Pro and learned new things about how to use the "mark in" and "mark out" functions, which allowed me to more easily select just a single convention/bid's Q&A and then send only that part of the file to a separate recording. I did that with all six of the groups that presented that evening (only Worldcons and bids; there were also SMOFCon bids, but that's outside of scope for what I was doing). I also learned how to queue up these recordings in Adobe Media Encoder, so that once I'd set them all up, I could compile all of the videos as a batch without me having to supervise it. I did end up botching one of the six files and had to re-do it, but that was part of the learning experience.

While setting this up is more time-consuming than just dumping the entire recording into YouTube, it has the advantage that you can look at only the convention or bid presentations that you want to see, and you don't have to deal with tech delays and can instead concentrate on the presentations themselves.

As I pointed out in the news item, these are the presentations from groups who were at SMOFCon 40 either in person or remotely. Some groups have bids that are out there but that did not make a showing at SMOFCon 40. I do not know the status of those bids, which includes the Tel Aviv in 2027 and the Brisbane in 2028 Worldcon bids.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 11:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios