kevin_standlee: (Fernley)
Last night, I walked down to City Hall to attend training on Nevada Government Ethics and the Nevada Open Meeting Law. I was a little uneasy about attending, given that I'm not actually an elected or appointed official, only an unsuccessful candidate for office, but I needn't have worried. First of all, turnout was not huge, and secondly, the Mayor said (when I offered to pay for some of the pizza on offer inasmuch as I wasn't an actual local official) that it was fine and not to fret about it. (I really did want to help pay for it, given that the Mayor had bought the pizza out of his own pocket to entice more people to attend, but he turned it down.)

Government/Rules Geekery )

While attending the training meant that I lost a couple of hours of sleep, I found it useful and educational. Now the question is whether I'll ever get to put any of it into practice.
kevin_standlee: (Fernley)
This evening, I went to my first-ever meeting of the Fernley city council. This was a special meeting to both officially certify the local election results (relatively routine and passed quickly), and to discuss whether to move forward with a request for legislation that would permit the city to impose a 5 cents/gallon diesel fuel tax to be earmarked for roads, even though the advisory question on the city ballot lost (by about one-third of one percent, or 23 votes).

The key procedural point here is that neither the advisory question nor council action would impose a diesel tax. All this was about was what was called a "Bill Draft Request" to the Nevada Legislative Council to act as a placeholder for requested legislation. It doesn't get legislation into the next session until and unless at least one member of the legislature adopts it, as our state assembly member, Robin Titus, explained when she spoke to the matter. And because of the legislative deadlines and Nevada's very short legislative session (90 days every two years), the council had to decide now whether to proceed or to walk away and wait another two years at least.

The city council, the mayor, the city manager, assembly member Titus, and the city's paid lobbyist in Carson City spent a long time talking about the proposal to submit the BDR even though the people of Fernley voted against it, albeit narrowly. Then it was time for the public hearing. Not many people had come to the meeting. I was the only one who stood up. I made sure my microphone light was on, the microphone was pointed correctly, that I could see my time clock (I used about 3:30 of my five minutes), and I spoke clearly and loudly. In short, I was trying to avoid the mistakes that I'd heard other speakers make. Besides, this isn't the first time I've done this sort of speaking. WSFS is my friend.

I quoted from the musical 1776 the line from Dr. Lyman Hall of Georgia, who paraphrased Edmund Burke of the British Parliament with the quote, "that a representative owes the People not only his industry, but his judgment, and he betrays them if he sacrifices it to their opinion." I told the council that they were elected the govern the city, and that if it takes submitting this BDR to get a seat at the negotiating table in the next legislative session, then they should do so.

When I stepped away from the microphone, I could swear that one of the council members applauded me. After the meeting, both the city manager and the lobbyist came up and thanked me. The council voted unanimously to submit the BDR. I think they would have done so anyway, but I hope that my speaking to them gave them heart that not everyone in Fernley is part of the "burn it all down, tear up my roads to gravel and dirt as long as I don't have to pay any taxes" crowd.

I'm so glad I have the experience of addressing, frankly, larger and possibly more hostile audiences as someone involved in the cut-and-thrust of WSFS politics. I hadn't prepared my remarks, but I think I made the points I wanted. I only wish that the live-streaming council sessions were recorded so I could go back and see and hear what I said.
kevin_standlee: (SMOF License)
I got the postcard reminding me that my driver's license was up for renewal the afternoon we left Fernley for Tempe. Had I been reading it (and the Nevada DMV website) closely enough, I would have realized that I could have renewed at the Tonopah DMV office — which is in the same building as the Tonopah Station Hotel where we spent that night. But I misread it as saying that I must bring a bunch of documents I do not carry around with me casually (birth certificate, house deed, social security card, tax records, etc.). That's only if I wanted a REAL-ID Act-compliant driver's license. Although I do have all of those documents (but it's a right hassle to pull them all together), I don't see the need for such an ID, because my US passport does just as well for all of the reasons stated for needing the super-duper ID card. Anyway, I skipped renewing at Tonopah, and after I got home, I read more closely and realized that I could just do a standard renewal without having to provide a dozen different additional documents.

This afternoon after my normal-these-days end of work (3 PM PT; an advantage of working Central Time Zone hours), I drove over to Fallon. Fernley doesn't have a DMV office; either you drive to Sparks or Fallon. We discovered by experimentation (apologies to Lisa, who was the experimental test subject) that waiting times at little Fallon are generally much shorter than those at the large office in Sparks. Sure enough, I had a five minute wait to pay my fee, hand over the form, and have my photo re-taken.

A sign of age: I now have the "must wear corrective lenses" endorsement, for I can no longer read the line of text without my glasses. Well, 51 years was a pretty good run, I guess.

I may have my new license before we leave for Europe, but it doesn't matter that much because I do have my passport (which I will of course need to even board the plane since the airlines sensibly won't let you on if they think they'd just have to carry you back on the next available flight), and we get back to the USA a week before my existing driving license expires. And I don't have any plans to drive a vehicle while in Germany/Finland/Iceland anyway.
kevin_standlee: (SMOF License)
I have received a notice from the California Department of Motor Vehicles informing me that I don't have California insurance on my vehicle as required by law and that I must provide proof of insurance soon or face Dire Consequences. Of course I don't have California insurance on my vehicle — It's not a California vehicle anymore! When I bit the bullet and officially established Nevada residency, I got Nevada insurance, registered the vehicle in Nevada, and got a Nevada driver's license. California's automated systems noticed that I no longer had California insurance, but not that I'd re-registered my vehicle in Nevada (and I did have to tell Nevada all about my previous registration and surrender my California license plates), despite the claims that all of the various state computer systems are perfectly interconnected in a panopticon-like system where They Know Everything.

Although I'm annoyed that I have to write to them (in a paper letter; no electronic system, and the notice said the people in DMV offices know nothing about the automatic insurance-monitoring system), I'm oddly reassured that the system is so inefficient that they don't actually know that I re-registered my vehicle and became a Nevadan unless I tell them myself. And I wouldn't be surprised if they still end up sending me more dunning notices for which I'm not actually liable.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 78 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 01:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios