kevin_standlee: (Business Meeting)
The Westercon Business Meeting was this morning. The only business was the formal announcement of the 2015 Westercon Site Selection results. There were 113 total ballots cast, of which 105 had a preference, and therefore 53 votes were needed to elect (majority). San Diego, the only bid on the ballot, received 92 votes, with 5 for None of the Above, 2 for Reno, and 9 other individual write-in votes. Here's the video of the meeting:

Give Yourself the Business )

It may not be obvious, but there was a quorum of at least 15 members present. Most of them were sitting behind where Lisa was running the camera, as we discovered that we get much better sound and video quality if she works from mid-room away from the air vent. Regrettably, San Diego's video presentation was very low-contrast, and therefore doesn't show up well in the video. Lisa points out that it was hard to read in the room where she was standing behind the camera.

There was no other business, so after San Diego made their presentation and answered some questions, the meeting adjourned sine die. There will therefore be no proposals forwarded to Salt Lake City for action.
kevin_standlee: (SMOF Zone)
I sometimes wonder why I bother being open with Worldcon financial figures, when I read people (no, I'm not going to link to it, but some of the people who read this LJ have probably read it) implying that the reason Worldcons are so expensive is because their first priority is feeding the committee's faces. At least the implication wasn't directly that we were in it to line our pockets. (My >$50K in personal debt laughs at the idea that I've been involved in conrunning to make money.)

You could eliminate every bit of convention-purchased F&B from a Worldcon's budget and it would bring the cost down -- possibly as much as $5 per member, but probably not that much.

I would like to see some of these people who are convinced that all we do is deliberately waste money and steal it from the poor fans to just try running one themselves. I'm reminded of a Corflu feedback session in which I sat in the back row and listened to a bunch of people who have never hesitated to take shots at "SMOFS" complain about how difficult and expensive it was to put on a 100-person Corflu.

I would also like to be able to organize a Worldcon where that at-the-door membership was commensurate with the cost of other local conventions -- say $125 for five days. (Some of the people complaining about the cost are comparing $50 for two days to a convention that's five days long.) And as soon as I don't have to work for a living and have $500,000 I can afford to risk underwriting half the cost of a modern Worldcon, I'll bid for one.
kevin_standlee: (Hugo Sign)
As we approach Worldcon, it's once again time for Silly Season with the Hugo Awards, where people trot out the same old tired lines (and lies) about how the Awards actually work. Cheryl has an excellent report on one such story, particularly the comments that perpetuate the assumption that there really is a shadowy group of Secret Masters who Control The Hugos and who plot to prevent Real Fans (which is to say include "anyone who thinks like me" and exclude everyone else) from participating. Like Cheryl, I'm insulted by people who basically say that everything she, I, John Scalzi, and all of the other people who have been working to improve the visibility and viability of the Hugos is rubbish and of course the Awards are terrible because they don't reflect their personal interests.

Well, guess what? I'm one of Them. I'm one of those people who works behind the scenes with the Hugo Awards, chairing the Hugo Awards Marketing Committee, staying heavily involved in WSFS business, and so forth. I'm pretty much Mr. Insider. But you'll probably be surprised to find that the Hugo Awards don't always reflect my tastes. Doubtless this would really surprise the Conspiracy Theorists, who would, if they had the Power that they imagine people like I have, ignore those stupid voters and give the Awards to the Right People. On the other hand, I'd rather have the awards reflect the voters' tastes and have the process be as open and transparent as possible.

Complaining that the voters have bad taste is one thing. Saying that the awards are illegitimate because Your Favorite Work didn't win or get nominated is just stupid. Want to make a difference? Get involved yourself. Don't let "Them" do it.

Note that the main article to which Cheryl is reacting does criticize the voters. But the author carefully states that he doesn't have voting rights. (He puts it in such a way that implies that someone is preventing him from having those rights, rather than him simply being unwilling to buy a WSFS membership.) I would, however, ask the author of that article "Why aren't you a voter? It's not hard. Why aren't you out there telling people what works you think should be nominated before the voting deadline instead of complaining about the choices after.

But if you're happier just sitting back and whinging, don't expect to be taken seriously. Remember, the only Secret of the Secret Masters of Fandom is that there isn't anything Secret about them.
kevin_standlee: (ConOps)
In regard to the nonsense happening in the comments on this entry, I'd plonk [livejournal.com profile] stegoking, but it would give him minor fuel for his paranoid fantasy that the SMOFS are conspiring against him and are actively plotting to keep the works he personally likes only good works off the Hugo Awards ballot.
kevin_standlee: (Whimsical Kevin)
As I mentioned a few days ago, I was watching Mamma Mia on the flight back from Chicago, and while running around on Saturday found myself scanning "busy, busy, busy" into "Money, Money, Money." I mentioned this to Cheryl, who had a brainstorm and produced this song.

In case you don't remember or know the melody, I found this karaoke version of it. The zip archive unpacks as a .kar file, but if you change the extension to .mid -- it's a MIDI -- you should be able to play it even without a karaoke program. I could get it to play in Windows Media Player.

IMO, it works pretty well.
kevin_standlee: Kevin after losing a lot of weight. He peaked at 330, but over the following years got it down to 220 and continues to lose weight. (Default)
Report from ConZilla, the 2006 Westercon in San Diego, with Sandra Childress doing the talking for Jim Briggs, who is here but not feeling that well. Next planned big committee meeting is in January unless the San Diego Chargers are in the playoffs and are the home team. Mostly recapping the standard material from the web site. Reminded people that July 1-4, 2006 is Saturday-Tuesday. No audience questions.

Report from Gnomeward Bound, the 2007 Westercon in San Jose, with Michael Siladi in a gnome hat, along with Kathryn Daugherty. (Crowd: "Kathryn, we want the hat!" Kathryn: "No.") Simliar recap of guests, noting that the guests are from all around the Westercon region. July 6-9 (Friday-Monday). Hotel rates $99 single-to-quad (audience made happy sounds).

Tom Whitmore asked, "Will you be Triple-Double-CrossCon?" Michael: "No, We're Gnomeward Bound."

Kathryn relented and put on the purple gnome hat, briefly, but Craige Howlett says he got the picture.

Meeting descended into "gnome" puns, followed by other jokes that I decline to report in deference to the makers.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 78 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 02:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios