kevin_standlee: (Giants Fanatic)
[personal profile] kevin_standlee
In the ongoing discussions about Fan Writer versus Pro Writer, I've repeatedly made the point (as have others) that "fan" and "pro" are not mutually exclusive states. You can be any of the four possible combinations. (If you're neither fan nor pro, you're not in the field at all, but it's a valid combination.)

I got to thinking about this, and this distinction is true in other areas as well, such as sports. One can be a baseball fan. A few people can be professional baseball players. But a pro can be a fan of the game, too. Some pro baseball players are not fans. Once they end their playing career, they pack away their gear, store it away, and never look at it again. Other former pro players are unabashedly fans of the game, too. Just look at the San Francisco Giants TV broadcasters Mike Krukow & Duane Kuiper. Both of them are former players, and today work as professional baseball broadcasters. But they are both clearly fans of baseball. Everything about they way they carry themselves and talk about baseball screams "fan" to me. And that's not a bad thing.

Update, 18:30: Corrected missing word "not" spotted in comments.

Date: 2007-07-17 11:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] debgeisler.livejournal.com
Well, no. The idea of getting paid for it as the key to understanding a "professional" is relatively new. A profession is "a calling requiring specialized knowledge and often long and intensive academic preparation." (The other fields of endeavor were crafts or trades...but somewhere along the way in the late 20th century, the term "profession" morphed.) The professions were those requiring study and theoretical knowledge (theology, law, medicine).

Amateur is one who does not do something as their vocation and is frequently untrained. The lack of training, the lack of pay, and the doing of something for fun rather than vocation are all equally important. (But see Kevin' note above about the way we define terms like "professional" and "amateurish"...)

Date: 2007-07-19 05:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lysana.livejournal.com
So what's your take on Dave Langford having been constantly nominated as Best Fan Writer even after he had several works published professionally?

Date: 2007-07-19 12:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] debgeisler.livejournal.com
That's easy. "Amateur" =/ "Fan." Fans love the stuff...love to read it, watch it, talk about it, dress up like it, play games with it...and "fan" writing is writing that talks about reading it, watching it, talking about it, and so on.

Langford *definitely* counts.

Now, with that said? I think we should have killed the award years ago. I'd like to do in *all* of the "people" awards. (Not the people, mind...)

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 3 4 56 7
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 03:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios