The Ongoing Death of Worldcon
Sep. 21st, 2007 09:53 amAs I continue to dig out from the backlog of messages of the past month, my blood pressure went up again when I read yet another person falsely claiming that Worldcon attendance is steadily dropping. This isn't really true if you can see past all of the statistical noise in the results.
Maybe some people thought that holding the Worldcon in Japan would result in tens of thousands of people showing up? There were around 3,000 bodies on site, of which somewhat under 1,000 were gaijin like me. To me, that is really quite good, considering that there has never been a Worldcon there.
I am one of a relatively small number of people who have been studying Worldcon attendance figures over time. One thing I've concluded is that it's very dangerous to try and draw conclusions from small data sets. No one year will tell you anything meaningful. There's too much variability in the data. Worldcons are sometimes held in places that are relatively inaccessible like Australia, or that have relatively poor air connections to the rest of North America, like Winnipeg. Sometimes they are held in areas with very large "day tripper" locations, like Southern California, the Bay Area, and Boston. So don't look at any given year and say, "We're doomed!"
Another thing to consider: You can't really compare a traveling convention like Worldcon to stationary, professionally or semi-professionally run ones like ComicCon or DragonCon. The very structure of Worldcon, which is a gigantic annual one-shot convention run completely by amateurs with no permanent staff and no ability to build up local goodwill, means that the current size of the event (roughly 5500 +/- 1500 in North American and Europe, lower elsewhere) is probably the limit to growth. To get significantly larger, we'd have to fundamentally alter the convention's management structure.
I continue to wonder why people who I think should know better keep predicting the imminent death of fandom.
Maybe some people thought that holding the Worldcon in Japan would result in tens of thousands of people showing up? There were around 3,000 bodies on site, of which somewhat under 1,000 were gaijin like me. To me, that is really quite good, considering that there has never been a Worldcon there.
I am one of a relatively small number of people who have been studying Worldcon attendance figures over time. One thing I've concluded is that it's very dangerous to try and draw conclusions from small data sets. No one year will tell you anything meaningful. There's too much variability in the data. Worldcons are sometimes held in places that are relatively inaccessible like Australia, or that have relatively poor air connections to the rest of North America, like Winnipeg. Sometimes they are held in areas with very large "day tripper" locations, like Southern California, the Bay Area, and Boston. So don't look at any given year and say, "We're doomed!"
Another thing to consider: You can't really compare a traveling convention like Worldcon to stationary, professionally or semi-professionally run ones like ComicCon or DragonCon. The very structure of Worldcon, which is a gigantic annual one-shot convention run completely by amateurs with no permanent staff and no ability to build up local goodwill, means that the current size of the event (roughly 5500 +/- 1500 in North American and Europe, lower elsewhere) is probably the limit to growth. To get significantly larger, we'd have to fundamentally alter the convention's management structure.
I continue to wonder why people who I think should know better keep predicting the imminent death of fandom.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 05:21 pm (UTC)Because saying, "Oh, Chicken Little! The sky is falling!" is satisfying? Or just because the convention may no longer be meeting their needs, so it will die any second?
I've been seeing the same predictions since the early 90s. And yet, N4 had the fourth (or fifth -- haven't seen L.A.'s 2006 numbers yet) largest total membership of any Worldcon.
Attendance is a matter of location (location, location), interest, publicity, and excitement. When the numbers run very low, there are usually quite good reasons for that.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 05:23 pm (UTC)CHris
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 06:06 pm (UTC)Chris
no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 09:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 06:06 pm (UTC)Chris
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 06:24 pm (UTC);-)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 09:04 pm (UTC)1) Exactly half of the 2001-2010 decade of Worldcons will have been outside of the US (Toronto, Glasgow, Yokohama, Montreal, Melbourne)
2) As of 2010, four of the last six Worldcons will have been outside the US.
3) Denver is the only US-based Worldcon in a four year period.
I suspect the last two points will lead to a lower average Worldcon attendance over the latter part of this decade, and may lead to a lower average afterwards if it causes the more casual set of attendees not to go for several years running and fall out of the habit.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 09:07 pm (UTC)Or do you mean 2007-2010?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 09:56 pm (UTC)For point 3): 2007: Yokohama, 2008: Denver, 2009: Montreal, 2010: Melbourne for Denver being the one in four year period US-based Worldcon. As stated at the top, this was assuming Austalia wins its currently unopposed bid for 2010.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 10:00 pm (UTC)I blame the need for a root canal.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 06:23 pm (UTC)I would only be worried if the lower attendance makes Worldon unsustainable. I'm thinking about community theater, for example, where we used the proceeds from this year's musical to fund the royalties & costume costs for next year.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 06:24 pm (UTC)I'm safe then
Date: 2007-09-21 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 11:01 pm (UTC)I think the concern I have is that we try to reach out to younger fen. I mean the 18-30 year old fans like me. They are the future Worldcon runners and can be the most passionate supporters for a Worldcon. It is one of the reasons why I have put my name in the Volunteer Database for 2008 even though nobody has invited me to be part of something, yet. I don't think Worldcon should be Dragon Con, Anime Expo or Comic con. I think we should market ourselves to those audiences. A smaller con can be as much fun, if not more than a megacon.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-22 07:46 am (UTC)