No WFC For Me After All
Oct. 22nd, 2008 12:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I will not be attending this year's World Fantasy Convention in Calgary after all, for reasons detailed here. Yes, I could go on my own, but without Cheryl, my heart really isn't in it. (And that's besides the financial aspects; while it's a shame to lose the sunk cost of the membership and airline ticket, there's still the other costs I'll avoid.)
This situation makes me furious at my own country's government and the way they have set up a border "protection" system that keeps out productive, law-abiding, good people who have been trying to follow the rules for reasons as arbitrary as "the person at the desk was having a bad day and decided he didn't like your looks, and there's nothing you can do about it." It's yet another step down a very slippery slope leading from rule-of-law to rule-of-man, and I don't like it one bit.
I'd write to my congressman, but I don't know what good it would do.
This situation makes me furious at my own country's government and the way they have set up a border "protection" system that keeps out productive, law-abiding, good people who have been trying to follow the rules for reasons as arbitrary as "the person at the desk was having a bad day and decided he didn't like your looks, and there's nothing you can do about it." It's yet another step down a very slippery slope leading from rule-of-law to rule-of-man, and I don't like it one bit.
I'd write to my congressman, but I don't know what good it would do.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 07:24 pm (UTC)Plus I explained the profusion of BOS and MSP entry stamps as being due to having my frequent flyer account with Northwest, and this rang true with him.
Even if I get my Green Card, it's still true - I can be bounced on arrival in the US, though I may have a right of appeal then.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 07:25 pm (UTC)Just a thought.
You'll pay a change fee, but it's better than losing it altogether.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 07:35 pm (UTC)We're investigating if cancelling the flight does still allow us to "bank" the value of the unused tickets against future travel, less change fees that will probably eat most of the value, but anything is better than nothing.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 07:42 pm (UTC)That is completely awful. Well not completely, but we aren't going to talk about how it could be even worse.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 07:50 pm (UTC)Remind Cheryl she is NOT alone. Lots of friends will want to help her come and go as often as she needs.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 07:58 pm (UTC)It's a place to start -- and nothing ventured, nothing gained.
(platitudes not withstanding, it's still the truth...)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 09:08 pm (UTC)I hope that's not the case.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 11:00 pm (UTC)Similarly, if my company needed to send me to our office in Eersel, Netherlands, for a few days or weeks to work on a computer problem, that would be legal under the same program. (Me staying more than 90 days or more than 180 days in a year would be a problem and would require a separate visa application. And the requirements to Australia are different because they don't participate in the visa waiver program. But I digress.)
The maddening part is that the system is set up so that even if you have a visa, the inspecting officer at the point of entry can, without recourse and without appeal, arbitrarily decide that s/he doesn't like your looks and can deny you entry. You may not hear about it happening that often, but that is how it can and does work.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 01:08 am (UTC)And I wish I could help with covering the costs.. we never managed to get our own attendance.. it just wasn't in the books with everything and the kids.. and now the baby.. and it's halloween weekend.. and kids take precedence..
Oh well.. I'm sure there will be other opportunities.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 03:04 pm (UTC)If she was flying from the UK directly to Calgary (much as she plans to go directly to Montreal next year for Worldcon), there would be no issue. It's the US transit that's the problem. Must keep our country safe from them dangerous furriners, you know. *fume*
no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 04:38 pm (UTC)John and I spent a day in Canada a few years ago, and John was stopped at the border trying to come home because he didn't have the 'proper documentation.' He was a naturalized U.S. citizen, traveling with his wife (who was born in the U.S.) and with a Social Security card and a legitimate job in the U.S. But because he was born in Scotland and was a citizen in Canada before he came to the U.S., this jerk wanted either a passport (John never did get one) or his citizenship papers.
I don't know why they finally recapitulated and let him come home, but I remember both of us spending an hour asking every official we could find "just what do you expect us to do?" I suppose at worse case they could have made me drive all the way home to dig out his citizenship papers (which he hadn't needed for a couple decades).
Of course, if he were alive today he would have gotten a passport, since the Canada to U.S. border has been tightened so much.