More About Worldcon Supporting Memberships
May. 7th, 2015 07:12 amThis material is adapted from a post I made at Making Light to refute the assertion that this year's Worldcon is Rolling in Dough from all of those extra Worldcon supporting memberships, presumably being made by people who think that the cost incurred by the Worldcon to service each supporting membership is Zero, and therefore the $40 revenue is "pure profit." This assumption is wrong, and I went back through the data I have to show how wrong it might be.
( Supporting Memberships Aren't Free Money )
So the analysis suggests that there is roughly $70,000 in additional usable surplus (after paying the costs of servicing the additional memberships) for Sasquan from all current supporting memberships. While this is obviously welcome enough, also isn't nearly as much money as you might think it is. A modern Worldcon is going to cost on the order of $1 million, and thus this amounts to about 7% of the Worldcon's total budget in extra money. It's good, but it's not the Mountain of Cash that some people seem to think it is.
Again, it's not that Sasquan is unhappy at getting more money. (When you have a convention center that charges $1/day/chair to rent the chairs in the function rooms and similar nickle-and-dime charges, you need all the money you can bring in.) It's just that people have been assuming that there's a lot more money available to spend than there really is likely to be.
( Supporting Memberships Aren't Free Money )
So the analysis suggests that there is roughly $70,000 in additional usable surplus (after paying the costs of servicing the additional memberships) for Sasquan from all current supporting memberships. While this is obviously welcome enough, also isn't nearly as much money as you might think it is. A modern Worldcon is going to cost on the order of $1 million, and thus this amounts to about 7% of the Worldcon's total budget in extra money. It's good, but it's not the Mountain of Cash that some people seem to think it is.
Again, it's not that Sasquan is unhappy at getting more money. (When you have a convention center that charges $1/day/chair to rent the chairs in the function rooms and similar nickle-and-dime charges, you need all the money you can bring in.) It's just that people have been assuming that there's a lot more money available to spend than there really is likely to be.