kevin_standlee: (Manga Kevin)
[personal profile] kevin_standlee
With the minor storm over L.A.con IV deciding that spending more than $30,000 to provide wi-fi service to their members was not a good use of the convention's resources (I agree), there has been some discussion of what a Worldcon spends its money on. There are some (IMO uniformed) people out there who have a hard time thinking that a Worldcon is spending money on anything because so much of what the convention must do is either invisible or taken for granted. So I dug through my files and did a rough breakdown of ConJose's income and expense by major category. I had to fiddle around quite a bit because the budget was arranged by division, but the expenses that get people excited are not necessarily neatly arranged. That's why there are several "other" categories and a miscellaneous into which a lot of small items from throughout the convention were rolled. If you really want to know this at a fine level of detail, e-mail me and I'll send you the line-item budget.

Another adjustment I made was to show only the net Art Show income (after paying the artists), rather than the gross. (ConJose's records showed the gross sales as income -- needed for sales-tax reporting -- and the payments to artists as a convention operating expense. I consider it misleading to show 15% of the convention's revenue that way because it's sequestered -- everything except the convention's commission goes to the artists.

So first we have how the convention's approximately $850,000 in revenue (net of art show; it was nearly $1 Million with that included) came to us. (I expect you'll need to click on the small graphics to get them large enough to read.)

As you can see, convention memberships are pretty much what keeps the con afloat. The other revenue is important, of course, but it's memberships that drive the convention.

Now, how did we spend that money? Since these reports are prepared four years after the convention and nearly a year after ConJose's Final Report to WSFS, they include all of the convention's revenue. ConJose has spent all of the money it took in. The total expenses, like the total revenue, were approximately $850,000. (I'd rather not introduce spurious precision here by quoting it to the penny, particularly because trying to aggregate reports like this across multiple years' reports means that there will be minor inconsistencies, but they are on the order of <0.5%.)

If you look at this, vast swaths of expenses are things like renting the convention center and paying the decorator (that's the tables and chairs and other furniture inside the convention center -- it ain't free, folks), or are things that are considered "entitlements" -- the post-con reimbursements. Things that get people so excited, like the Con Suite or Tech Services (shown separately from the Event-specific costs because ConJose had Tech Services in a different division than Events; that is, no one Event was charged the fixed cost of obtaining the tech kit any more than Programming wasn't charged the cost of renting the function rooms or Exhibits the cost of the Exhibit Halls; therefore, Events overall looks inexpensive.)

"Member Services" includes costs of Registration, Childcare, Scooters, and a number of smaller items. "Administration Other" includes the cost of renting office space for the two years leading up to and immediately after the convention.

Also note that Hugo Awards looks a little high, but that's because it was charged not only the direct cost of the trophies and plaques (about $5,600) but also costs associated with printing and mailing the Nominating ballot (mailed separately from a PR) and also of sending 2003 Nominating Ballots to all of ConJose's members to remind them that they were eligible to nominate.

Again, anyone who wants the fine details behind these numbers should write to me directly and I will send you the latest and I think last version (revision 50) of the ConJose budget, which shows every line item on which we received or spent money.

This message is posted as public. If you want to send it on to someone else or point people at it, I don't care, and you don't need to ask my permission to do so.

Edit, 10:45: Based on a comment, added explanation that expenses were also $850,000, the same as revenue.

Edit, 11:30: Modified the pie charts so that the charts themselves and their ScrapBook Gallery descriptions include the gross amount of approximately $850,000.

Date: 2006-07-23 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kevin-standlee.livejournal.com
You may well be right. Most of the post-election promotional parties a Worldcon holds are held because they're expected of them -- parties at subsequent Worldcons. (That cost should go down by 50% now that we've returned to two-year lead time.) ConJose held parties at BayCon and Westercon as much to attract staff volunteers as to sell memberships. It's hard to say whether such parties are worthwhile, because it's more than just "how many people bought memberships at those parties," (if that's the only criteria, you shouldn't hold parties) but also "how much goodwill did you generate for your convention," which is much more difficult to measure.

Date: 2006-07-23 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jbriggs.livejournal.com
I believe we did generate goodwill at our post-election parties, but not to the extent that it helped our budget. In retrospect we should have re-allocated promotional budgets ($500 advertising, $2500 parties) more equally and not hit Arizona so heavily. As it was we were hitting 2-3 San Diego conventions and 2-4 Arizona conventions annually, we also promoted in L.A. heavily. We started to eliminate planned parties because they were costing more than revenues generated; against my better judgement we decided to host parties at Baycon and Leprecon this year (Baycon because, well, you know, and Leprecon because we'd tapped the Arizona market and we'd run out of steam); someone at the last minute volunteered to coordinate, and of course we got the expected result of no memberships. Its possible we got a few at-the-doors from Arizona folks. It was a complete waste of funds for BayCon - as it was in 2005. I know that ConJecture sells almost no memberships at BayCon.

Regarding goodwill, we had loads from Arizona having been to four Coppercon's, three Leprecons, a TusCon and a Westercon in promoting the bid and convention. The post ConKopelli Phoenix Fission worried us a little but we were on good terms with all parties so the effect was negligible for us. Outside of LA/SD, Arizona was the largest population group to attend Conzilla.

The things that hurt us most were the ovious ones: AnimeExpo the same weekend, ComicCon two weeks after, and Worldcon in August, all geographically close. The Economy Stupid effect hurt a little too.

Thanks for putting up the budget charts. Wish we had something like this in 2002 (^: Getting sample budgets from people was like pulling teeth.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 78 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 2223 24
25 26 27 28 293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 31st, 2025 12:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios